David Epstein, author of Range, writing about Herbert Simon’s notion of “satisficingin the NYT as part of his promotional blog tour for his new book, Inside the Box:

Maximizers tend to be less satisfied with their decisions and their lives. They are typically less happy, more prone to regret and more likely to compare themselves endlessly with others. Satisficers don’t necessarily have low standards. Their standard is “good enough for me” rather than “the best out there,” and that makes it possible to feel satisfied with their choices, instead of haunted by the ones they didn’t make.

The psychologist Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, who first used the term “flow” to describe states of complete absorption in an activity, put it well. By making up one’s mind to invest in a choice, regardless of more attractive options that may come along later, “a great deal of energy gets freed up for living, instead of being spent on wondering about how to live.”

Delightful. Both feet fully in as opposed to one foot out. Assuredly hard to always employ in a world where social media functions as “an infinite comparison engine,” but delightful.

 

// 07.23.26

Three quotes about science from the delightful Reality Is Not What it Seems by theoretical physicist Carlo Rovelli:

Science is born from this act of humility: not trusting blindly in our past knowledge and our intuition. Not believing what everyone says. Not having faith in the accumulated knowledge of our fathers and grandfathers.

Science is not reliable because it provides certainty. It is reliable because it provides us with the best answers we have at present.

It is precisely its openness, the fact that it constantly calls current knowledge into question, which guarantees that the answers it offers are the best so far available: if you find better answers, these new answers become science.

Rovelli’s book on “The Journey to Quantum Gravity” includes a thoroughly enjoyable tour of physics from Democritus (pre-Socratic originator of the atomic theory of the universe) through today. As one might imagine, the implications of quantum loop gravity aren’t easy to grok. Nonetheless, he tackles the challenge admirably: eminently readable, highly recommended.

// 07.20.26